HUMAN RIGHTS hrw.orgDefending Human Rights Worldwide
WATCH

Human Rights News FrenchSpanishRussianKoreanArabicHebrewspacer
RSSPortugueseGermanChinesePersianMore Languagesspacer
   

US: Don’t Misrepresent Human Rights Watch to Justify Guantanamo Trials

Contrary to US Claims, Human Rights Watch Opposes Khadr Prosecution

(Guantanamo Bay Naval Base, February 5, 2008) – The US government fundamentally misrepresented Human Rights Watch’s position to justify its prosecution of Omar Khadr, a Canadian citizen facing charges for war crimes allegedly committed when he was just 15, Human Rights Watch said today.

" Not only is this position wrong, it’s absurd. Human Rights Watch has called the military commissions fundamentally unfair from the start – and even more egregious that Khadr was a child when he allegedly committed the crimes. "
Clive Baldwin, senior legal advisor
  
Contribute

Related Material

The Omar Khadr Case: A Teenager Imprisoned at Guantanamo
Background Briefing, June 1, 2007

US: Makeshift Military Commissions Rules Unfair
Press Release, November 5, 2007

More on Military Commissions
Thematic Page, June 29, 2006

Letter to US Secretary of Defense Robert Gates on Omar Khadr
Letter, February 1, 2008

Responding to Khadr’s argument that the military commissions do not have legal authority to prosecute child offenders, the US government in a court filing Monday invoked Human Rights Watch to support its claim that the military commissions should go forward.  
 
“Not only is this position wrong, it’s absurd,” said Clive Baldwin, senior legal advisor at Human Rights Watch. “Human Rights Watch has called the military commissions fundamentally unfair from the start – and even more egregious that Khadr was a child when he allegedly committed the crimes.”  
 
In making the claim, the government cited a document that the US Campaign to Stop the Use of Child Soldiers – a coalition that includes Human Rights Watch – submitted to the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child in November 2007. The government argued that because the submission did not explicitly condemn the use of military commissions to try Khadr, it amounted to implicit support. However, the submission cited Khadr’s case as an example of the United States’ failure to meet its obligations to rehabilitate and otherwise treat child soldiers in accordance with their age.  
 
“To read the campaign’s submission as implicitly supporting Khadr’s trial before military commissions indicates at best the government’s desperation, and at worst a disingenuous attempt to pervert Human Rights Watch’s well known position on this,” Baldwin said. “The document the government cites actually uses the Khadr case as an example of the United States’ failure to respect its obligations on the treatment of child soldiers.”  
 
Human Rights Watch said that Khadr’s trial should either be dismissed or moved to civilian courts that take into account his status as a child at the time of his offense. Human Rights Watch also reiterated its call on Canada to intervene on behalf of one of its citizens and urge the United States to transfer Khadr to a fair process or repatriate him to Canada for rehabilitation.
 

 
Suggest This Page to a Friend
Your Email (required)
Your Friend's Name
Friend's Email (required)
Email addresses are not stored.
Your Message



Enter Security Code
(case sensitive)




Please read the HRW Privacy Policy

HRW Logo Contribute to Human Rights Watch

Home | About Us | News Releases | Publications | Info by Country | Global Issues | Campaigns | Community | Bookstore | Film Festival | Search | Site Map | Contact Us | Press Contacts | Privacy Policy

© Copyright 2006, Human Rights Watch    350 Fifth Avenue, 34th Floor    New York, NY 10118-3299    USA