Dublin, Ireland
May 19, 2008
Like many states, the Cluster Munition Coalition (CMC) believes that interoperability is an important issue and one that we would like to see resolved as early as possible in these negotiations. We also think that an early solution is indeed possible.
From our discussions with governments, the only reasons they seem to give about why this convention must be approached differently than the Mine Ban Treaty is that the lawyers got it wrong 11 years ago, and that the United States is much more likely to use cluster munitions than it was landmines – though at the time the US told everyone that it absolutely had to be able to use scatterable antipersonnel mines and that it would use them.
If states do decide that new text is essential on this matter, it is crucial that they make it clear that they object to and will discourage any use of cluster munitions by any armed force, that they will not engage in any activities that run counter to the object and purpose of the convention, and that they are only seeking better legal protections, not greater freedom for another party to use the weapon.
Thank you.
Related Material
Save Civilians: Ban Cluster Munitions by 2008
Special Focus
Final Talks on Cluster Munition Ban Treaty
Press Release, May 16, 2008
More on Human Rights Watch's work on cluster munitions
Thematic Page
Cluster Munition Coalition
Web Site