![]() |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
||
![]() |
||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Work of Human Rights WatchDuring 1998 Human Rights Watch gathered detailed information on serious abuses against children around the world and developed strategies and advocacy campaigns to end those abuses. We conducted research to bring to the worlds attention the effects on children of the genocidal war in Rwanda; the treatment of abandoned and orphaned children in orphanages and other non-penal institutions in Russia; the incarceration of children in adult lockups in Jamaica in shocking conditions in violation of both Jamaican and international law; conditions for children in Pakistans police lockups, prisons, and juvenile institutions; and children tried as adults and detained in adult jails in counties throughout the state of Maryland in the United States. We did extensive follow-up advocacy on our 1997 report on children kidnaped, raped, and often killed in Uganda by the Lords Resistance Army. We also did follow-up advocacy on our earlier reports on children confined in juvenile justice facilities in the United Statesin Georgia, Louisiana, and Colorado. In addition, we gave priority to an international campaign to stop the use of children as soldiers, and to the provisions relevant to children in the draft statute for an International Criminal Court. Coalition to Stop the Use of Child Soldiers
Human Rights Watchs Brussels office was instrumental in developing a European strategy for the campaign. It met with European leaders, established an extensive contact network (including other nongovernmental organizations and European institutions), and requested official data on national legislation and procedures on military recruitment from over fifty ministries of defense. The office also helped initiate a briefing on child soldiers for members of the European Parliament at its plenary session in Strasbourg, and a resolution on child soldiers at the Asia, Caribbean, and Pacific-European Union joint assembly, both held during September. Human Rights Watch also took the lead in establishing a U.S. Campaign to Stop the Use of Child Soldiers. Bringing together human rights, peace, youth advocacy, and religious organizations, the campaign was formed to push for U.S. support for a straight-eighteen international ban, raising the U.S. military enlistment age to eighteen, and eliminating U.S. military aid that facilitates the use of child soldiers by other governments and groups. Human Rights Watch met on several occasions with representatives of the U.S. Department of Defense, State Department, National Security Council, and other U.S. government officials to advocate stronger international standards prohibiting the use of child soldiers. We enlisted congressional support by organizing briefings on Capitol Hill, assisting in the drafting of congressional resolutions, and initiating a congressional letter to the president on the issue which garnered over sixty signers from the House of Representatives. Working with the Center for Defense Information, Human Rights Watch also secured signatures from over thirty retired military officers for a letter to the president urging his support for the optional protocol. Uganda
International Criminal Court
The court will have jurisdiction over the war crime of conscripting children under the age of fifteen years into national armed forces or armed groups, or using them to participate actively in hostilities. Human Rights Watch had pressed for language which would give the court jurisdiction over the forced participation in hostilities of children under the age of eighteen. However, many key states were unwilling to move beyond the framework of the Protocols Additional to the Geneva Conventions, which addressed the recruitment and participation in hostilities of children under fifteen only. The ICC statutes list of war crimes also included intentional attacks on educational institutions and schools, which were frequently targeted for recruitment purposes and to terrorize civilian populations. In addition, the statute recognized the need for expertise in the court on violence against children. It obligated state parties to take into account the need to include judges with legal expertise on violence against women and children and required prosecutors to appoint advisors with legal expertise on specific issues, including, but not limited to, violence against women and children. For child victims or witnesses, the statute provided for in camera proceedings or presentation of evidence by electronic or other special means. The court might order otherwise, but only after taking into account all the circumstances, particularly the views of the victim or witness. The statute also mandated the establishment of a Victims and Witness Protection Unit, which would provide protective measures and security arrangements, counseling and other appropriate assistance and would include staff with expertise in trauma. Finally, a major breakthrough at the Rome conference was states agreement that children under the age of eighteen would not appear before the court as defendants. Many states had previously supported setting an age of criminal responsibility below eighteen, or allowing the court discretion to try minors based on subjective criteria such as the defendants maturity. Human Rights Watch successfully argued that while children may at times become the perpetrators of acts of extreme violence, consideration must still be given to their unique status as children, and that they be treated in accordance with international juvenile justice standards. The extraordinary nature and punitive function of the ICC, we said, was incompatible with the rehabilitative goals of international juvenile justice standards. Juvenile Justice
Another Human Rights Watch researcher visited Pakistan in May to study the countrys administration of juvenile justice, including conditions in police custody and prisons, due process issues, and proposals for law reform. The researcher visited two prisons and the sole juvenile detention facility in Punjab, Pakistans largest province. He also observed proceedings in the countrys sole juvenile court, interviewed senior federal and provincial officials, and met with activists from a range of nongovernmental organizations. In the spring of 1998, Human Rights Watch sent a team of researchers to investigate the treatment of thousands of Rwandan children in detention, who were accused of participating in the 1994 genocide. Researchers also examined the protection of childrens property rights in Rwanda in the wake of the genocide. A report on their findings was forthcoming. After the release of the United States Department of Justices report on Georgias juvenile detention facilities in February 1998, Human Rights Watch was instrumental in bringing together an ad hoc committee of child advocates and civil rights attorneys to advocate for a substantive state response to the serious violations documented. Subsequently known as the Juvenile Justice Coalition, the group included a broad range of service providers, mental health professionals, youth workers, lawyers, and advocates. The coalition monitored the implementation of the settlement between the DOJ and the State of Georgia, conducted public education around juvenile justice issues, and worked for appropriate public policy and legislation. In April 1998, Human Rights Watch submitted a detailed critique of the settlement to Georgias Governor Zell Miller, providing recommendations for the settlement plans development and enforcement phase. Although Human Rights Watch sought to meet with the governors office and the commissioner for Georgias Department of Juvenile Justice to discuss our recommendations, these officials denied our requests for a meeting. Human Rights Watch continued to investigate the conditions of detention in the United States, visiting five Maryland county jails from July to October 1998. The investigation examined the pre-trial detention of juveniles charged as adults, evaluating detainedchildrens access to counsel, the extent to which detained juveniles are separated from adults, the use of isolation or restraints as punitive measures, the adequacy of education and special education, and the existence of alternatives to confinement. Unaccompanied Children Detained by the U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service
Child Labor
Orphans and Abandoned Children
Relevant Human Rights Watch reports:
|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
||
BACK TO TOP![]() Copyright © 1999 Human RIghts Watch |
||
![]() |