Beyond Burning
The Ripple Effects of Incendiary Weapons and Increasing Calls for International Action
Incendiary weapons, which are notorious for their horrific human cost, cause extremely painful burn injuries that are difficult to treat and lead to long-term physical and psychological harm. More than 115 countries have joined the 1980 Convention on Conventional Weapons (CCW) Protocol III on Incendiary Weapons. International law on incendiary weapons needs to be strengthened, however, because the protocol has two loopholes. First, the protocol’s definition of incendiary weapons does not encompass multipurpose munitions such as white phosphorus, which are “primarily designed” to create smokescreens or signal troops, yet have the same cruel incendiary effects. Second, while the protocol prohibits the use of airdropped incendiary weapons in civilian areas, it has weaker regulations for the use of ground-launched incendiary weapons.
November 7, 2024
The Ripple Effects of Incendiary Weapons and Increasing Calls for International Action
Airburst Munitions Used Unlawfully in Populated Areas
Syrian, Russia Forces Also Use Incendiary Weapons
The Human Cost of Incendiary Weapons and the Limits of International Law
Delivered by Mary Wareham, Deputy Director of Crisis, Conflict and Arms Division
Resources on Incendiary Weapons from Human Rights Watch and the International Human Rights Clinic at Harvard Law School
Delivered by Bonnie Docherty, Senior Researcher
Countries Providing Weapons Risk Complicity in Grave Abuses
Syrian, Russia Forces Also Use Incendiary Weapons
Use in Populated Areas Poses Grave Risks to Civilians