In the 659-page
World Report 2016, its 26th edition, Human Rights Watch reviews human rights practices in more than 90 countries. In his introductory essay, Executive Director
Kenneth Roth writes that the spread of terrorist attacks beyond the Middle East and the huge flows of refugees spawned by repression and conflict led many governments to curtail rights in misguided efforts to protect their security. At the same time, authoritarian governments throughout the world, fearful of peaceful dissent that is often magnified by social media, embarked on the most intense crackdown on independent groups in recent times.
By the end of 2014, authorities had used a 2012 law targeting advocacy groups that accept foreign funding to label more than 100 nongovernmental organizations as “
foreign agents,” including the country’s leading rights groups, and slapped many with hefty fines. Over a dozen organizations opted to close rather than bear the stigmatizing label.
In November 2015, the Justice Ministry accused one of Russia’s most outspoken and prominent human rights groups, the
Memorial Human Rights Center, of undermining the country’s “constitutional rule,” among other allegations that could result in criminal charges against Memorial’s leadership. The action also sends a chilling signal to other groups on the “foreign agents” list.
In March, parliament adopted a law on “
undesirable foreign organizations” that authorizes the extrajudicial banning of foreign groups that allegedly undermine Russia’s security, defense, or constitutional order. Russians who maintain ties with “undesirables” or share their materials with Russian audiences face penalties, including prison terms.
The government stepped up its suppression of online communications and authorities prosecuted several cases against those who voiced online criticism of Russia’s occupation of Crimea. A law that went into effect in September bans the storage of Russian Internet users’ personal data on foreign servers and requires foreign sites that collect such data to store it within Russia. International social networking sites, among others, could be blocked if they don’t comply.
Russia provided military and financial assistance to anti-government forces in eastern Ukraine but made no tangible attempts to rein in abuses by such forces. In August, a
military court, in an apparent political move, found Oleg Sentsov, a Ukrainian filmmaker, and Olexander Kolchenko, a Ukrainian activist, guilty of operating an anti-Russian “terrorist organization” in Crimea, sentencing them to long prison terms. The trial of
Nadezhda Savchenko, a Ukrainian pilot, on charges of premeditated murder in connection with the deaths of two Russian journalists in a shelling attack in eastern Ukraine in 2014 was deeply problematic.
The confrontation between Islamist insurgents and law enforcement agencies in the North Caucasus was fraught with human rights abuses. In
Dagestan, police put Salafi Muslims on special watch lists, repeatedly detaining them and in some cases fabricating criminal cases against them. Police also raided Salafi mosques across Dagestan and conducted numerous abusive special operations.
The year was also particularly dire for human rights defenders, independent journalists, and lawyers in the North Caucasus. In Dagestan, unidentified men viciously beat a local
human rights lawyer. Pro-government thugs destroyed the office of the
Joint Mobile Group of Human Rights Defenders in Chechnya twice. In
Ingushetia, security accused a leading local activist of anti-Russian sabotage.
Authorities have used use the country’s anti-lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) “propaganda” law to disrupt pro-LGBT rights events and
harass LGBT people and their supporters. But the authorities largely failed to prosecute homophobic and transphobic violence.